The End of LIBOR: How Credit Managers and other Alternatives should Manage the Transition

March 10, 2020 by Martin Lovick, Andrew Poole

Why the urgency?

On 27 February 2020, the FCA wrote a Dear CEO letter to all asset management firms to set out its expectations in terms of firms preparing for the termination of LIBOR at the end of 2021. This letter is but the latest in a barrage of co-ordinated messages from the UK authorities to chivvy the industry into action.

This follows a Q&A issued to firms by the FCA on 19 November 2019 looking at the conduct risks associated with the LIBOR transition. On 16 January 2020, the FCA, the Bank of England and the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates (“RFR Working Group”) published transition targets for 2020, stating that “firms need to accelerate efforts to ensure they are prepared for LIBOR cessation by end-2021” and adding that “2020 will be a key year for transition”.

The background to replacing LIBOR

Two primary reasons lie behind the case to replace the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as the key benchmark for wholesale borrowing: first, since the financial crisis there has been a structural decline in the use of the interbank market as a source of funding; second, a fragile system for the quoting of rates, and hence the setting of LIBOR, which was wide open to manipulation.

In April 2017, the RFR Working Group recommended a reformed version of the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the long-term replacement of LIBOR for sterling markets under the administration of the Bank of England. It is anchored to an active and liquid market in wholesale overnight rates and hence offers a much more robust proxy to the risk-free rate. There has also been international coordination in generating replacement benchmarks in other key currencies – for example, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) for US dollars.

What are the UK authorities’ immediate priorities?

The targets announced in January are intended to support a smooth transition to SONIA and other alternative rates and include some specific milestones for asset managers – for “milestone”, read “not quite obligatory, but take more seriously than guidance”!

  • From 2 March 2020: (less than one week after the Dear CEO went out) for market makers to switch from LIBOR to SONIA for sterling interest rate swaps, so asset managers should now take new positions in the latter where possible.
  • End of Q3 2020: for asset managers to cease investment in sterling LIBOR products which mature beyond 2021, as well as launching new products or performance fees which are linked to LIBOR.
  • Q1 2021: the target date for asset managers to have significantly reduced exposure to sterling LIBOR products in their client portfolios.

What are the FCA’s chief concerns?

Beyond achieving a smooth transition to SONIA and other relevant benchmarks without significant market disruption, the FCA identifies a number of key conduct risks during the implementation period. Firms’ LIBOR transition plans thus need to take account of the following:

  • Product performance: whether legacy LIBOR exposures in client portfolios will perform as expected, particularly after the end of 2021.
  • Product governance: whether any new products with LIBOR exposures will adhere to the principles of the product governance rules (for example, whether the charging structure is sufficiently transparent and understandable).
  • Planning and accountability: whether firms have established proportionate transition plans which have been agreed by their governing bodies (including appropriate accountability and clear statements of responsibility for individual Senior Managers).
  • Clients’ best interests: whether firms are proactively replacing LIBOR with products that reference alternative rates and amending the constitutional documents of existing products to include fall-back provisions.
  • Conflicts of interest: whether firms are mis-representing past performance, even if advertently, and whether clients are being disadvantaged by adjustments in performance fees.

What are the main challenges for asset managers?

Credit strategies clearly are likely to contain the most significant exposure to LIBOR referenced products and hence present the greatest challenges, but the following checklist may be relevant to other strategies as well:

  • Loan documentation: for any sterling or other LIBOR-based credits, a review of the underlying documentation such as the loan facility agreement should be undertaken to identify if a replacement for LIBOR has already been identified. This can then feed into portfolio income monitoring tools to ensure accurate interest calculations (always helpful when calculating interest coverage tests for instance).
  • Loan agency role: for managers engaged in the rapidly expanding direct lending space who have taken on the loan agency role for floating sterling loans, you will have to identify the new base rate and ensure that those rates can be set in accordance with the criteria in the agreements (e.g. x days before reset date). This will also most likely have to be agreed with the borrower.
  • Interest rate hedging: hedging out interest rate risk, swapping interest rates or engaging in perfect asset swaps may also be areas to pay particular attention to in order to identify a LIBOR replacement. Any alterations to these agreements may need discussions with counterparties to identify the ideal replacement.     
  • Other operational issues: firms should review all outward payment streams to investors to ensure that no payments to investors is based upon or references LIBOR. These could potentially include tranches of the CLOs, credit-linked notes, or references to LIBOR as part of a return hurdle.

What other steps are the UK authorities taking to accelerate the transition?

The Bank of England has been at the forefront of additional measures to encourage market participants to get ahead of the switch, recently announcing that:

  • It will publish a compounded SONIA-linked index from July 2020 which will help firms construct compounded SONIA rates in an easy-to-use, consistent format.
  • It is consulting on the publication of daily “screen rates” for specific period averages of compounded SONIA rates, thus removing the need for agents to perform these calculations.
  • It plans to increase the haircuts on LIBOR-linked collateral which it lends against from October 2020.

Are other regulators taking an interest?

As mentioned earlier, the replacement of LIBOR across major currencies has been a multi-national endeavour. Of particular interest is that the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) highlighted exposure to LIBOR as one of its exam focus areas in 2020: “OCIE encourages each registrant to evaluate its organization’s and clients’ exposure to LIBOR, not just in the context of fall-back language in contracts, but its use in benchmarks and indices; accounting systems; risk models; and client reporting, among other areas.”

What should firms be doing now?

  1. Establish a project team to plan and oversee the transition (front office, legal, operations, investor relations, compliance).
  2. Get sign-off from the governing body including allocation of senior management responsibility.
  3. Educate the front-office in making the switch to LIBOR alternatives.
  4. Engage operations team on identifying and mitigating embedded LIBOR exposure.
  5. Brief legal on updating product and investor documentation.
  6. Brief investor relations on any amendments to product information and marketing materials.
  7. Keep clients appropriately informed of such changes as they are developed and implemented.
  8. Monitor compliance with regulatory obligations and FCA priorities.

For More Information

Contact us or call +44 (0)20 7042 0560 for more information about how ACA can assist in assessing and reviewing your firms reliance and usage of LIBOR performing full reviews of product offerings to investors and within investment portfolios.